Filed: Jul. 19, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 19, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 05-30235 Summary Calendar _ GERALD BOURG, ET AL., Plaintiffs, GERALD BOURG; REID SPANGLER; MICHAEL SPEARS; JESSE MENDOZA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES CO.; ET AL, Defendants, UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES CO.; UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP, INC. SEVERANCE PLAN, Defendants-Appellees. _ GERALD BOURG, ET AL., Plaintif
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 19, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 05-30235 Summary Calendar _ GERALD BOURG, ET AL., Plaintiffs, GERALD BOURG; REID SPANGLER; MICHAEL SPEARS; JESSE MENDOZA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES CO.; ET AL, Defendants, UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES CO.; UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP, INC. SEVERANCE PLAN, Defendants-Appellees. _ GERALD BOURG, ET AL., Plaintiff..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 19, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _____________________ Clerk No. 05-30235 Summary Calendar _____________________ GERALD BOURG, ET AL., Plaintiffs, GERALD BOURG; REID SPANGLER; MICHAEL SPEARS; JESSE MENDOZA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES CO.; ET AL, Defendants, UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES CO.; UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP, INC. SEVERANCE PLAN, Defendants-Appellees. __________________ GERALD BOURG, ET AL., Plaintiffs, GERALD BOURG; REID SPANGLER; MICHAEL SPEARS; JESSE MENDOZA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES CO.; ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORP.; ANADARKO ENERGY SERVICES CO.; UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP, INC. SEVERANCE PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, Defendants-Appellees. __________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC Nos. 6:00-CV-622 and 6:00-CV-2269 __________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by that judge in her ruling of January 25, 2005. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 2