Filed: Dec. 20, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-30261 Clerk BARBARA GASPARD; DONNA DUGAS, individually and on behalf of Baily Dugas; KELLY DUGAS, individually and on behalf of Baily Dugas; MARK DUGAS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO; ET AL Defendants, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO; SEARS ROEBUCK & CO; SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP, formerly known as Schindler Haug
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-30261 Clerk BARBARA GASPARD; DONNA DUGAS, individually and on behalf of Baily Dugas; KELLY DUGAS, individually and on behalf of Baily Dugas; MARK DUGAS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO; ET AL Defendants, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO; SEARS ROEBUCK & CO; SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP, formerly known as Schindler Haugh..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-30261 Clerk BARBARA GASPARD; DONNA DUGAS, individually and on behalf of Baily Dugas; KELLY DUGAS, individually and on behalf of Baily Dugas; MARK DUGAS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO; ET AL Defendants, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO; SEARS ROEBUCK & CO; SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP, formerly known as Schindler Haughton Elevator Corp, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Case No. 6:03-CV-1313 Before JONES, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court has carefully reviewed this appeal in light of the briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent parts of the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error of law or fact and therefore AFFIRM for essentially the reasons stated by the trial court. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. AFFIRMED. 2
