United States v. Lopez-Sigala, 05-50040 (2005)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 05-50040
Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 06, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 6, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 05-50040 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. VALENTIN LOPEZ-SIGALA Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, El Paso 3:04-CR-1459-ALL - Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that Appellant’s unopposed motion to vacate the
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 6, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 05-50040 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. VALENTIN LOPEZ-SIGALA Defendant - Appellant - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, El Paso 3:04-CR-1459-ALL - Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that Appellant’s unopposed motion to vacate the s..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 6, 2005 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _____________________ Clerk No. 05-50040 _____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. VALENTIN LOPEZ-SIGALA Defendant - Appellant --------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, El Paso 3:04-CR-1459-ALL --------------------- Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that Appellant’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant’s unopposed motion to remand the case to the Western District of Texas, El Paso Division for resentencing is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant’s motion to suspend briefing is DENIED as moot. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant’s alternative request for an extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief 30 days from the denial of Appellant’s motion to vacate and remand is DENIED as moot.
Source: CourtListener
