Filed: Nov. 08, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 8, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50081 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FRANCISCO ROJO LOPEZ, also known as Francisco ROJO, also known as Paco, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-618-4 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judg
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 8, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50081 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FRANCISCO ROJO LOPEZ, also known as Francisco ROJO, also known as Paco, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-618-4 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judge..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 8, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-50081
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FRANCISCO ROJO LOPEZ, also known as
Francisco ROJO, also known as Paco,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:03-CR-618-4
--------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel for Francisco Rojo Lopez has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lopez has filed a response in which he moves
for the appointment of new counsel. Our review of counsel’s brief,
Lopez’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues
for appeal. Accordingly, Lopez’s motion for new counsel is DENIED,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-50081
-2-
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.