Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pervez v. England, 05-50162 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-50162 Visitors: 41
Filed: Jul. 13, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 13, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50162 Summary Calendar NILOFER PERVEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GORDON R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Department of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (6:03-CV-373) - Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-Appellant Nilofer
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 13, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50162 Summary Calendar NILOFER PERVEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GORDON R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Department of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (6:03-CV-373) -------------------- Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-Appellant Nilofer Pervez, a 46-year old female whose national origin is Pakastani, appeals from the district court’s grant of the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing Perez’s action in which she claimed age, sex, race, and national origin discrimination and retaliation in her employment. We have carefully reviewed the parties’ appellate briefs and the record in this case, and we are satisfied that the district court correctly granted summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee Gordon R. England, * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Secretary of the Department of the Navy, dismissing Pervez’s claims and ordering that she take nothing. Essentially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s comprehensive Order filed November 15, 2004, that court’s grant of summary judgment is, in all respects, AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer