Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Hidalgo-Peralta, 04-50383 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-50383 Visitors: 31
Filed: Jun. 21, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-50383 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VALENTIN HIDALGO-PERALTA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-2342-ALL-DB - Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel for Valentin Hidalgo-Per
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                    June 21, 2006

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                            No. 04-50383
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VALENTIN HIDALGO-PERALTA,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                  USDC No. EP-03-CR-2342-ALL-DB
                       --------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel for Valentin Hidalgo-Peralta (Hidalgo) has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Hidalgo has not filed a

response to counsel’s motion.   Our independent review of the

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer