Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-51304 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SAMUEL ARAUJO-URIAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-1432-ALL-PRM - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Samue
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-51304 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SAMUEL ARAUJO-URIAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-1432-ALL-PRM - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Samuel..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-51304
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SAMUEL ARAUJO-URIAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:04-CR-1432-ALL-PRM
--------------------
Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Samuel Araujo-Urias (Araujo)
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Araujo has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.