Filed: Jan. 25, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-51409 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. DAWN MARIE COBB, KENNETH RYAN HAMANN Defendants - Appellants - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-141-2 - Before KING, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* A jury found that Dawn Marie Co
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-51409 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. DAWN MARIE COBB, KENNETH RYAN HAMANN Defendants - Appellants - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-141-2 - Before KING, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* A jury found that Dawn Marie Cob..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 04-51409
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
DAWN MARIE COBB, KENNETH RYAN HAMANN
Defendants - Appellants
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 7:04-CR-141-2
--------------------
Before KING, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
A jury found that Dawn Marie Cobb and Kenneth Ryan Hamann,
aided and abetted by each other, possessed equipment, chemicals,
products and materials used to manufacture methamphetamine and
opened, used, and maintained a place for the purpose of
manufacturing, distributing, and using methamphetamine. A jury
also found that Harmann attempted to manufacture methamphetamine.
Both Cobb and Harmann challenge the sufficiency of the evidence
supporting their convictions, having adequately preserved their
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 04-51409
-2-
challenge in district court. See United States v. Resio-Trejo,
45 F.3d 907, 911 n.6 (5th Cir. 1995)
Viewing the evidence produced at trial in the light most
favorable to the verdict, a reasonable trier of fact could have
found that the evidence established beyond a reasonable doubt
Cobb’s and Hamann’s guilt as to each of the charged offenses.
See United States v. Villarreal,
324 F.3d 319, 322 (5th Cir.
2003). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.