Filed: Feb. 24, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 24, 2006 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10066 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BILLY RAY CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-423-ALL-R - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to rep
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 24, 2006 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10066 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BILLY RAY CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-423-ALL-R - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to repr..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
February 24, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-10066
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BILLY RAY CLARK,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:03-CR-423-ALL-R
--------------------
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Billy Ray
Clark has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Clark has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.