Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-10312 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GEORGE GIRARD JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-41-2 - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent George Gir
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-10312 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GEORGE GIRARD JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-41-2 - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent George Gira..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 05-10312 Clerk
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GEORGE GIRARD JOHNSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:04-CR-41-2
--------------------
Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent George Girard Johnson has
requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Johnson has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.