Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Trevino, 05-10695 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-10695 Visitors: 40
Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10695 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANIEL RAY TREVINO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-76-ALL - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to r
More
                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                   Fifth Circuit
                                                                  F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                    December 12, 2006

                                                               Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                       Clerk
                             No. 05-10695
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANIEL RAY TREVINO,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 5:04-CR-76-ALL
                       --------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel

Ray Trevino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Trevino has not filed a response.        Our independent review of the

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer