Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10695 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANIEL RAY TREVINO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-76-ALL - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to r
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10695 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANIEL RAY TREVINO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-76-ALL - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to re..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-10695
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DANIEL RAY TREVINO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:04-CR-76-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel
Ray Trevino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Trevino has not filed a response. Our independent review of the
brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.