Filed: Feb. 24, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10920 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEMITRIUS TASHIA PRINTERS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-287-6 - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Crimin
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10920 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEMITRIUS TASHIA PRINTERS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-287-6 - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Crimina..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-10920
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DEMITRIUS TASHIA PRINTERS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:02-CR-287-6
--------------------
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Demitrius Tashia
Printers raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.
Johns,
625 F.2d 1175, 1176 (5th Cir. 1980), which held that FED.
R. CRIM. P. 11 is inapplicable to probation-revocation hearings.
The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and
the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.