Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Chandler, 05-10993 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-10993 Visitors: 101
Filed: Jul. 14, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10993 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NIGEL CHANDLER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-154-ALL - Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case,
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   July 13, 2006

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 05-10993
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NIGEL CHANDLER,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                    USDC No. 3:04-CR-154-ALL
                      --------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Nigel Chandler

raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.

Slaughter, 
238 F.3d 580
, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held that

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000), did not render 21

U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face.    The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.



     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer