Filed: Apr. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-11116 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KENNETH ALLEN HAMPTON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-58-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-11116 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KENNETH ALLEN HAMPTON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-58-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-11116
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KENNETH ALLEN HAMPTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:02-CR-58-ALL
--------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Kenneth Allen
Hampton raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.
Hinson,
429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert.
filed (Mar. 8, 2006)(No. 05-9633), which held that a defendant is
not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether the terms of
supervised release have been violated. The Government’s motion
for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.