United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 August 22, 2006

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 05-11204
                           Summary Calendar


LEROY B. MEEK,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LAWRENCE BRACKENS; NFN MCMILLER, Sergeant; NFN DENHAM,
Lieutenant; NFN NORWOOD, Sergeant; NFN KERRY, Sergeant,

                                      Defendants-Appellees.

                         --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Northern District of Texas
                          USDC No. 7:05-CV-40
                         --------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

         Leroy B. Meek, Texas prisoner # 505329, appeals the

dismissal of his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for

failure to exhaust administrative remedies.     Meek had 30 days

from the entry of the June 30, 2005, judgment to file a timely

notice of appeal.     See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A).    Meek’s pro se

August 12, 2005, notice of appeal was untimely.     See 

court may grant a defendant an additional 30 days

in which to file a notice of appeal upon a showing of excusable


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 05-11204
                                -2-

neglect or good cause.   See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(5).   Meek’s

notice of appeal, which was filed within this additional 30-day

period, sufficed as a motion under Rule 4(a)(5).   See United

States v. Golding, 

, 184 (5th Cir. 1984); see also

Houston v. Lack, 

, 276 (1988) (holding that a notice

of appeal submitted by a pro se prisoner is deemed filed on the

date the prisoner submits it to prison officials for mailing).

     Accordingly, Meek’s appeal is held in abeyance, and the case

is REMANDED to the district court for a ruling under FED. R. APP.

P. 4(a)(5).   Upon ruling, the district court shall promptly

return the case to this court for dismissal or further

proceedings, as may be appropriate.