Filed: Oct. 25, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-11396 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADOLPH GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-50 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to repr
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-11396 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADOLPH GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-50 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to repre..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-11396
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ADOLPH GUTIERREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:02-CR-50
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adolph
Gutierrez on appeal from the revocation of his probation has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gutierrez has not
responded to counsel’s motion.
Our independent review of the brief filed by counsel and of
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-11396
-2-
further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.