Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20149 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHANNON TERRELL FISHER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-10-ALL - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Sh
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20149 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHANNON TERRELL FISHER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-10-ALL - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Sha..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-20149
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHANNON TERRELL FISHER,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-10-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Shannon Terrell Fisher
in his direct criminal appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967). Fisher has not responded to counsel’s motion.
Our independent review of the brief filed by counsel and of
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.