Filed: Oct. 25, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20531 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARK ANTHONY CLARKE, also known as Jerrell Jovan Carter, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-99-ALL - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Th
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20531 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARK ANTHONY CLARKE, also known as Jerrell Jovan Carter, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-99-ALL - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-20531
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARK ANTHONY CLARKE, also known as Jerrell Jovan Carter,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:05-CR-99-ALL
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender (FPD) appointed to represent
Mark Anthony Clarke on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and
a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Clarke has not filed a response. Our independent review of
counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, the FPD’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.