Filed: Jul. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 12, 2006 _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-21019 Summary Calendar _ GENANA HOLLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MARICOPA COUNTY; ET AL., Defendants, WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. _ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 4:04-CV-1980 _ Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This court,
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 12, 2006 _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-21019 Summary Calendar _ GENANA HOLLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MARICOPA COUNTY; ET AL., Defendants, WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. _ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 4:04-CV-1980 _ Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This court, ..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 12, 2006 _______________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-21019 Summary Calendar _______________________ GENANA HOLLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MARICOPA COUNTY; ET AL., Defendants, WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 4:04-CV-1980 ________________________________________________________________ Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This court, having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and pertinent portions of the record, concludes there is no reversible error in the district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We therefore AFFIRM the final judgment of the district court essentially for the reasons stated in its opinion. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
