Filed: Sep. 28, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 28, 2006 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30625 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee versus MICHAEL COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:04-CR-323 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* As both parties agree, Collins’s plea agreemen
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 28, 2006 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30625 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee versus MICHAEL COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:04-CR-323 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* As both parties agree, Collins’s plea agreement..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
September 28, 2006
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-30625
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
versus
MICHAEL COLLINS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:04-CR-323
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
As both parties agree, Collins’s plea agreement precludes
his present argument that the sentence imposed was unreasonable.
See United States v. Burns,
433 F.3d 442, 450 (5th Cir. 2005).
DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.