Filed: Oct. 25, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30777 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAMIRO RODRIGUEZ-LINARES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:05-CR-20017-ALL - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30777 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAMIRO RODRIGUEZ-LINARES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:05-CR-20017-ALL - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-30777
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RAMIRO RODRIGUEZ-LINARES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:05-CR-20017-ALL
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramiro
Rodriguez-Linares (Rodriguez) has requested leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967). Rodriguez has not filed a response. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.