Filed: Oct. 24, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30858 Conference Calendar LANCE HANSON AYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus 482018-DIV: “N”; ALLEN CORRECTIONAL; 19TH JUDICIAL, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:05-CV-347 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Lance Hanson
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30858 Conference Calendar LANCE HANSON AYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus 482018-DIV: “N”; ALLEN CORRECTIONAL; 19TH JUDICIAL, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:05-CV-347 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Lance Hanson ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 24, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-30858
Conference Calendar
LANCE HANSON AYERS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
482018-DIV: “N”; ALLEN CORRECTIONAL; 19TH JUDICIAL,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:05-CV-347
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Lance Hanson Ayers, Louisiana prisoner # 122241, appeals the
district court’s dismissal of his complaint for failure to comply
with a court order to amend his pleadings. We previously
remanded this matter to the district court to allow the court to
rule on a post-judgment motion by Ayers seeking reinstatement of
his suit. The district court subsequently granted the motion and
ordered the case reinstated on the district court’s docket.
Accordingly, because the judgment which is the subject of this
appeal has been vacated, the present appeal does not present a
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-30858
-2-
live case or controversy and is dismissed as moot. See Rocky v.
King,
900 F.2d 864, 867 (5th Cir. 1990).
APPEAL DISMISSED.