Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Peacock, 05-40127 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-40127 Visitors: 41
Filed: Oct. 10, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 10, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40127 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BILLY J. PEACOCK, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:03-CR-392-6 - Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel for Billy J. Peacock has moved for lea
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 October 10, 2006

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                             No. 05-40127
                           Summary Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BILLY J. PEACOCK,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 7:03-CR-392-6
                      --------------------

Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel for Billy J. Peacock has moved for leave to withdraw

and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Peacock has not filed a response.    Our review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues

for appeal.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer