Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Regalado-Flores, 05-40198 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-40198 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 21, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40198 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAVIER REGALADO-FLORES, also known as Pedro Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-1387-ALL - Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Javier R
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  June 20, 2006

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 05-40198
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAVIER REGALADO-FLORES,
also known as Pedro Sanchez,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 5:04-CR-1387-ALL
                         --------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Javier Regalado-Flores appeals his sentence for illegal

entry.    He argues that the district court erred by ordering him

to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of

supervised release.   This claim is not ripe for review on direct

appeal.    See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu, 
428 F.3d 1100
,

1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9,

2006)(No. 05-8662).   The claim is dismissed.   See 
id. at 1102.
     APPEAL DISMISSED.



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer