Filed: Jun. 21, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40198 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAVIER REGALADO-FLORES, also known as Pedro Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-1387-ALL - Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Javier R
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40198 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAVIER REGALADO-FLORES, also known as Pedro Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-1387-ALL - Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Javier Re..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 20, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-40198
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAVIER REGALADO-FLORES,
also known as Pedro Sanchez,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:04-CR-1387-ALL
--------------------
Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Javier Regalado-Flores appeals his sentence for illegal
entry. He argues that the district court erred by ordering him
to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of
supervised release. This claim is not ripe for review on direct
appeal. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,
428 F.3d 1100,
1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9,
2006)(No. 05-8662). The claim is dismissed. See
id. at 1102.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.