Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Sanchez, 05-40687 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-40687 Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 24, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40687 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RITO A. SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CR-206-ALL - Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender, appointed to
More
                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                   Fifth Circuit
                                                                  F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                    February 24, 2006

                                                               Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                       Clerk
                             No. 05-40687
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RITO A. SANCHEZ,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 2:05-CR-206-ALL
                       --------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Rito A.

Sanchez, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).           Sanchez

has not filed a response to the motion.       Our independent review

of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for

appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal

is DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer