Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Reyes-Reyes, 05-40763 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-40763
Filed: Nov. 09, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 9, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40763 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAMON REYES-REYES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-796-ALL - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                November 9, 2006

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 05-40763
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAMON REYES-REYES,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                    USDC No. 5:04-CR-796-ALL
                      --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ramon Reyes-Reyes

raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Valdez-

Maltos, 
443 F.3d 910
, 911 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,        S. Ct.

(Oct. 2, 2006)(No. 06-5473), and United States v. Garcia-Mendez,

420 F.3d 454
, 457 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 
126 S. Ct. 1398
(2006), which held that a Texas conviction for burglary of a

habitation was equivalent to burglary of a dwelling, and by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
523 U.S. 224
, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 05-40763
                               -2-

not a separate criminal offense.   The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer