Filed: Apr. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-40907 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDGAR CASTANEDA-SALGADO, also known as Juan Hernandez-Aguirre, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-250-1 - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-40907 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDGAR CASTANEDA-SALGADO, also known as Juan Hernandez-Aguirre, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-250-1 - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 05-40907 Clerk
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDGAR CASTANEDA-SALGADO,
also known as Juan Hernandez-Aguirre,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:05-CR-250-1
--------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar
Castaneda-Salgado has filed a motion to withdraw and brief
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).
Castaneda-Salgado has not filed a response. Our independent
review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.