Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41134 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHANE RAY DOESCHER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 4:04-CR-93-1 - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Shane
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41134 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHANE RAY DOESCHER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 4:04-CR-93-1 - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Shane ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-41134
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHANE RAY DOESCHER,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 4:04-CR-93-1
--------------------
Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Shane Ray Doescher has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Doescher has
responded to counsel’s motion, moving for leave to file a
“controlling supplemental amendment.” Doescher has also moved
this court to reconsider its previous without-prejudice denial of
counsel’s motion to withdraw, and he has filed two motions for
the appointment of counsel.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-41134
-2-
Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Doescher’s
response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. All other
motions are DENIED.