Filed: Apr. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41226 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN ORDONES-FERUZCA, also known as Rafael Ornelas-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:01-CR-87-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURI
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41226 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN ORDONES-FERUZCA, also known as Rafael Ornelas-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:01-CR-87-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-41226
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN ORDONES-FERUZCA, also known as
Rafael Ornelas-Garcia,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:01-CR-87-ALL
--------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, appointed counsel for Juan
Ordones-Feruzca, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Ordones-Feruzca has not filed a response to counsel’s
motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-41226
-2-
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.