United States v. Qualls, 05-50303 (2006)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 05-50303
Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 27, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 27, 2006 _ Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-50303 Clerk Cons. w/ 05-50305 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. RONALD LEE QUALLS Defendant - Appellant - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (04-CR-34) - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motio
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 27, 2006 _ Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-50303 Clerk Cons. w/ 05-50305 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. RONALD LEE QUALLS Defendant - Appellant - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (04-CR-34) - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 27, 2006 _____________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-50303 Clerk Cons. w/ 05-50305 _____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. RONALD LEE QUALLS Defendant - Appellant --------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (04-CR-34) --------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate sentence is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to remand cases to the district court for resentencing is granted. ____________________ * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
