Filed: Oct. 25, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10184 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BENJAMIN DUNN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:00-CR-35-1 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender has moved for leav
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10184 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BENJAMIN DUNN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:00-CR-35-1 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender has moved for leave..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-10184
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BENJAMIN DUNN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:00-CR-35-1
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender has moved for leave to withdraw
from representation of Benjamin Dunn and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Dunn
has not responded to counsel’s motion and brief. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there are no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.