Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wilson v. Potter, 06-10568 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-10568 Visitors: 33
Filed: Sep. 28, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT September 27, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10568 Summary Calendar JAMES H. WILSON, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CV-00716-A - Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CUR
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT               September 27, 2006

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 06-10568
                           Summary Calendar


JAMES H. WILSON, SR.,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service,

                                      Defendant-Appellee.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                    USDC No. 4:05-CV-00716-A
                      --------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing Wilson’s case without prej.udice for Wilson’s failure

to follow the court’s order.     See Callip v. Harris County Child

Welfare Dept., 
757 F.2d 1513
, 1518-19 (5th Cir. 1985); Rogers v.

Kroger Co., 
669 F.2d 317
, 320 (5th Cir. 1982).

     AFFIRMED.




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer