Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Rakel, 06-30219 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-30219 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 06-30219 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON RAKEL, also known as Jason David Rakel, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:05-CR-50079-2 - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jason Rakel
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 12, 2006

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                              No. 06-30219                          Clerk
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JASON RAKEL, also known as Jason David Rakel,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Western District of Louisiana
                     USDC No. 5:05-CR-50079-2
                       --------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Jason Rakel appeals his conviction for conspiracy to

distribute methamphetamine.    For the first time on appeal, he

argues that his guilty plea was not supported by a sufficient

factual basis.    We hold that Rakel’s admitted purchase of 70.7

grams of methamphetamine in a two-week period is indicative of

distribution, not personal use.    Consequently, the district court

did not plainly err in accepting his plea.      See United States v.

Palmer, 
456 F.3d 484
, 489, 492 (5th Cir. 2006).

     AFFIRMED.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer