Filed: Oct. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-30225 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERRICK L. FIELDS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:05-CR-50046-ALL - Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Derrick L. Fields appeals his convict
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-30225 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERRICK L. FIELDS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:05-CR-50046-ALL - Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Derrick L. Fields appeals his convicti..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-30225
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DERRICK L. FIELDS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 5:05-CR-50046-ALL
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Derrick L. Fields appeals his conviction for being a felon
in possession of a firearm and for possessing a stolen firearm.
He argues that the district court erred when it denied his motion
to suppress evidence of the firearm, which was seized pursuant to
a search warrant. Because the affidavit supporting the search
warrant was more than a “bare bones” affidavit, the officers who
executed the warrant relied on it in good faith, and evidence of
the firearm was admissible. See United States v. Satterwhite,
980 F.2d 317, 320-21 (5th Cir. 1992).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-30225
-2-
AFFIRMED.