Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Fields, 06-30225 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-30225 Visitors: 39
Filed: Oct. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-30225 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERRICK L. FIELDS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:05-CR-50046-ALL - Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Derrick L. Fields appeals his convict
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  October 12, 2006

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                            No. 06-30225
                          Summary Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DERRICK L. FIELDS,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Western District of Louisiana
                    USDC No. 5:05-CR-50046-ALL
                       --------------------

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Derrick L. Fields appeals his conviction for being a felon

in possession of a firearm and for possessing a stolen firearm.

He argues that the district court erred when it denied his motion

to suppress evidence of the firearm, which was seized pursuant to

a search warrant.    Because the affidavit supporting the search

warrant was more than a “bare bones” affidavit, the officers who

executed the warrant relied on it in good faith, and evidence of

the firearm was admissible.    See United States v. Satterwhite,

980 F.2d 317
, 320-21 (5th Cir. 1992).

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
            No. 06-30225
                 -2-

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer