Filed: Oct. 25, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40153 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL DE JESUS JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CR-475-ALL - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appoi
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40153 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL DE JESUS JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CR-475-ALL - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appoin..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-40153
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MANUEL DE JESUS JIMENEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:05-CR-475-ALL
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel
De Jesus Jimenez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
De Jesus Jimenez has not filed a response. Our independent
review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.