Filed: Oct. 25, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40186 c/w No. 06-40196 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CELSO CHAVEZ-BALTAZAR, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-149 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Def
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40186 c/w No. 06-40196 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CELSO CHAVEZ-BALTAZAR, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-149 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defe..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-40186
c/w No. 06-40196
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CELSO CHAVEZ-BALTAZAR,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:05-CR-149
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed for Celso Chavez-
Baltazar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Chavez-
Baltazar has not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our
independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-40186
c/w No. 06-40196
-2-
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.