Filed: Dec. 06, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 6, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40202 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAVIER SALGADO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-1387-ALL - Before REAVLEY, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal C
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 6, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40202 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAVIER SALGADO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-1387-ALL - Before REAVLEY, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Ca..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 6, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-40202
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAVIER SALGADO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:05-CR-1387-ALL
--------------------
Before REAVLEY, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Javier Salgado
raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.
United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal
offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.