Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Smith, 06-50008 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-50008 Visitors: 20
Filed: Oct. 25, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-50008 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO LARICO SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CR-30-2 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Antonio L
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 October 25, 2006

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 06-50008
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO LARICO SMITH,
                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                       USDC No. 6:05-CR-30-2
                        --------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Antonio Larico Smith has

requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Smith has filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Our independent review of the brief, Smith’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.     Counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-50008
     -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer