Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20602 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES WILSON BRYANT, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-389-18 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represen
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20602 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES WILSON BRYANT, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-389-18 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-20602
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES WILSON BRYANT,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:03-CR-389-18
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent James Wilson Bryant has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Bryant has not
filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of
counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues
for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.