Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-21044 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ISMAEL LUNA JUSTO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-579-3 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Ismael
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-21044 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ISMAEL LUNA JUSTO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-579-3 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Ismael ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-21044
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ISMAEL LUNA JUSTO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-579-3
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Ismael Luna Justo has
requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Justo has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s
brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.