Filed: Jan. 09, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT January 9, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40207 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TREVATHAN JABAR GLEEN, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (9:04-CR-26-1) Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Trevathan Jab
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT January 9, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40207 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TREVATHAN JABAR GLEEN, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (9:04-CR-26-1) Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Trevathan Jaba..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT January 9, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-40207
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TREVATHAN JABAR GLEEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
(9:04-CR-26-1)
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Trevathan
Jabar Gleen moves for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gleen
has not filed a response. Our review of the record and counsel’s
brief shows there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this
appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2