Filed: Feb. 15, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT February 15, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40704 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LEKENA NEKOLE SIMMONS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (2:03-CR-13-5) Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Lekena Nekole Simmons has
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT February 15, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40704 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LEKENA NEKOLE SIMMONS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (2:03-CR-13-5) Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Lekena Nekole Simmons has r..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT February 15, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-40704
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LEKENA NEKOLE SIMMONS,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
(2:03-CR-13-5)
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Lekena Nekole Simmons has
requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). A copy of counsel’s
motion was sent to Simmons at multiple addresses, and she has not
filed a response. Our review of counsel’s brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is excused from further
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
responsibilities; and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R.
42.2.
2