Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41122 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DONALD GENE PIFER, SR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-112-ALL - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender app
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41122 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DONALD GENE PIFER, SR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-112-ALL - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appo..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-41122
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DONALD GENE PIFER, SR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:04-CR-112-ALL
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Donald
Gene Pifer, Sr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Pifer has not filed a response. Our independent review
of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue
for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.