Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Willis, 05-50985 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-50985 Visitors: 27
Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50985 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HAROLD EUGENE WILLIS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-221-ALL - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represe
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                February 14, 2007

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 05-50985
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HAROLD EUGENE WILLIS, JR.,
                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. 7:04-CR-221-ALL
                       --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Harold Eugene Willis, Jr.,

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Willis has not filed a response.   Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues

for appeal.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer