United States v. Lopez-Cerda, 05-51057 (2007)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 05-51057
Visitors: 23
Filed: Feb. 12, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 12, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 05-51057 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MELQUIADEZ LOPEZ-CERDA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio USDC No. 5:05-CR-57-ALL _ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court i
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 12, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _ Clerk No. 05-51057 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MELQUIADEZ LOPEZ-CERDA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio USDC No. 5:05-CR-57-ALL _ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 12, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III _____________________ Clerk No. 05-51057 _____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MELQUIADEZ LOPEZ-CERDA, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio USDC No. 5:05-CR-57-ALL __________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is affirmed. The district court’s expression of caution in departing from or deviating from the sentencing guidelines does not render a properly calculated guideline sentence unreasonable. There was no error. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. AFFIRMED. 2
Source: CourtListener
