Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Cardenas, 05-51078 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-51078 Visitors: 30
Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-51078 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RUDY CARDENAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-45-7 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Rudy Cardena
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                February 14, 2007

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 05-51078
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RUDY CARDENAS,
                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
            Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Western District of Texas
                        USDC No. 5:05-CR-45-7
                         --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Rudy Cardenas has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).     Cardenas has filed a

response.   Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Cardenas’s

response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for

appeal.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer