Filed: Aug. 21, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 21, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10181 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ-FLORES, also known as Memo Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-378-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appoin
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 21, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10181 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ-FLORES, also known as Memo Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-378-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appoint..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
August 21, 2007
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-10181
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ-FLORES, also known as Memo
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:02-CR-378-2
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Guillermo Rodriguez-Flores
(Rodriguez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rodriguez has filed a response.
Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Rodriguez’s response
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should
not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth
in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-10181
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2