Filed: Apr. 27, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 27, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10466 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. MARK A SMITH Defendant - Appellant - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-3 - Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mark A. Smith appeals from the sentence imposed followi
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 27, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10466 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. MARK A SMITH Defendant - Appellant - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-3 - Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mark A. Smith appeals from the sentence imposed followin..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 27, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-10466
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
MARK A SMITH
Defendant - Appellant
--------------------
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:05-CR-3
--------------------
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mark A. Smith appeals from the sentence imposed following
his guilty plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a
firearm. Smith’s plea agreement contained an appeal waiver,
which the Government seeks to enforce. Smith’s attempt to
construe the sentencing court’s statements regarding his right to
appeal as an interpretation of the appeal waiver provision lacks
merit. The sentencing court’s erroneous statements regarding
Smith’s right to appeal did not negate an otherwise knowing and
voluntary waiver. See United States v. Gonzalez,
259 F.3d 355,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 06-10466
-2-
358 (5th Cir. 2001). Moreover, the Government has not waived
enforcement of that waiver. See United States v. Acquaye,
452
F.3d 380, 382 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Melancon,
972
F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, Smith’s appeal
seeking to challenge the district court’s application of a
U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) adjustment is barred by his appeal waiver.
See
Melancon, 972 F.2d at 568.
AFFIRMED.