Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Delgado, 06-20044 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-20044 Visitors: 49
Filed: Apr. 18, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-20044 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN ASPRILLA DELGADO, also known as Baby, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-377-1 - Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorne
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   April 18, 2007

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                            No. 06-20044
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN ASPRILLA DELGADO, also known as Baby,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 4:04-CR-377-1
                       --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Juan Asprilla Delgado on

appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).       Asprilla

Delgado has filed a response.   Our independent review of the

brief, the record, and Asprilla Delgado’s response discloses no

nonfrivolous issue in this appeal.   Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.       See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer