Filed: Jul. 19, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 19, 2007 July FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-20058 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff–Appellee v. MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN JAFFRIE, also known as Fakir Mohammad Hussain Jaffrie Defendant–Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas 4:04-CR-00537 Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This appeal presents a fact-intens
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 19, 2007 July FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-20058 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff–Appellee v. MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN JAFFRIE, also known as Fakir Mohammad Hussain Jaffrie Defendant–Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas 4:04-CR-00537 Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This appeal presents a fact-intensi..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 19, 2007
July
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-20058
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff–Appellee
v.
MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN JAFFRIE, also known as Fakir Mohammad
Hussain Jaffrie
Defendant–Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
4:04-CR-00537
Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This appeal presents a fact-intensive suppression issue. Having carefully
reviewed the appeal in light of the briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent parts
of the record, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in denying
the defendant’s motion to suppress.1
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
1
See United States v. Jones,
234 F.3d 234, 239 (5th Cir. 2000); United States v. Asibor,
109 F.3d 1023, 1038 (5th Cir. 1997).
No. 06-20058
AFFIRMED.
2